Paragraph 1 | We have already explained the number of the figures, the character and number of the premisses, when and how a syllogism is formed; |
Paragraph 2 | This then is the reason common to all syllogisms whether universal or particular. |
Paragraph 3 | But in particular syllogisms there will be no necessity of inferring what is subordinate to the conclusion (for a syllogism does not result when this premiss is particular), but whatever is subordinate to the middle term may be inferred, not however through the syllogism, e.g. if A belongs to all B and B to some C. |